一个大马，各自表述
A Malaysian, respective interpretations
Submitted by webmaster on Wed, 2010-10-06 09:35
06-10-2010
06-10-2010
“一个马来西亚”理念本属全民共同接受的国家纲领，不论是国土疆域或思想意识的层面，它所意含的国家完整性是不容地域、州属、种族和宗教之区别所切割的。
然而，今天它在不同族群中所引发的效应，却具有严重的分歧性，沦为 “一个大马,各自表述”。非马来人认为合理的平权诉求，却被一小撮马来民粹分子刻意炒作为摧残马来特权的进军号，乃当年李光耀鼓吹〝马来西亚人的马来西亚〞的翻版。这种演变发展当然不是纳吉首相始料所及。可当初他提倡〝一个大马〞理念时所留存下来的〝创造性模糊〞，恰好为别具居心者提供了蓄意扭曲的空间。
其实这种情景已有前案可寻，当年马哈迪首相提倡〝马来西亚族〞(BANGSA MALAYSIA)理念时，马来社会中的保守民粹派何尝不也将之诠释为〝民族同化〞的同义词?吊诡的是，今天已退隐多年的马哈迪竟会站在对立面，为巫统的民粹派与土著权威组织 (PERKASA)的理念主张撑腰张目。
从目前这种各自表述的现象看来，各族的思维方式和思想意识的差距是相当明显的。非马来人渴望的民族平等平权，若以普世价值观来衡量，自然无可厚非，乃有理有节的维权诉求。但站在马来民族的权益立场来看,这不啻是一种对固有特权的冲击,是变相的违宪侵权行为。
因此，即便是马来社会的温和派，对他族的权益诉求，其底线充其量只能认同〝公平对待〞，而不是平起平坐。在这节骨眼儿上，马来民粹派则更为肆无忌惮，直把非马来人视为外来者。迩来，闹得沸沸扬扬的〝寄居论〞、〝乘客论〞及〝回中国论〞等论述，正是这种思维的最好印证。对他们而言，外来者乃坐享其成的一群，能有同席议事的权利，已是格外的通融。
在长期的〝零和意识〞(即ZERO SUM MENTALITY，俗称〝你嬴我输〞的意识心态)与大马来支配主义(MALAY DOMINANCE)的灌输下，认同各族平权，否定本族特权的所谓马来开明派，毕竟尚属少数，乃马来社会里的非主流派。
在华裔社会里，就一般民众的心态而言，尊重宪法所赋予的马来人特殊地位与权益，已是不争的既成事实。惟它不意味着他族的公民权利因而应该受到侵蚀排斥。华社对纳吉首相的〝一个大马〞理念抱存希望，不光是因为它让华社看到公平施政、落实平权的契机；更重要的是，它的整合性将能进一步发挥各族固有的互补优势，从而强化国家的竞争力。
华社会相信纳吉首相的改革诚意，惟独是改革求变必须要坚定不移。任何基于偏狭的政治得失考量而作的妥协，势必会让改革受挫，甚至功败垂成。改革求变不是在野党的专利，它也不是改朝换代的代名词。
一个长期执政的政党，可在两种情况下进行改革：一是为了永续执政而主动改革，以期能给人民带来新希望，并与时俱进，追上世界发展的节拍；二是为了保住政权而须被动求变。这种改革主要是因应时局所需。说的好听是从善如流、俯顺民意；可摆在眼前的难堪现实是，若不改革，就只有备受推翻的选择。
举凡是长期执政的政党，似乎都挣不脱利益集团肘制的魔咒。偏偏任何形式的改革都会直接或间接损及利益集团的既得利益，因此改革会遭遇这些势力的反扑，乃预料中事。在当前的政党政治体制下，党代表操纵了党意和决策。一旦党意受到利益的渗透，任何顺应民意的改革宏愿，最终皆会不敌而归。
当然，自甘接受利益掌控的政客党棍，不会看不到党意乖离民意所将激起的民愤，甚至会令到本党面临灭顶之灾的可能。可他们的盘算是：既便是灭顶在即，且让我临下台鞠躬前，狠狠地捞它一把，亦不失为上算。
这正是金钱政治长期腐蚀的写照，我们不难从308政治大海啸后的政治生态得到启示。观乎此，纳吉首相能不慎乎？〝一个大马〞的理念能否如愿贯彻，它不单考验首相的改革决心和毅力，同时对国阵巫统在党意和民意之间，孰轻孰重的取舍拿捏，何尝不是一项严峻的考验？
Translated by Google
"Malaysia" concept commonly accepted in this country is a national program, whether land boundaries or ideological level, meaning it can not be with the national integrity of the region, the state is, the distinction between race and religion are separated.
However, today it is in different populations, the effects caused by, but it has serious divisive and become "a Malaysian, respective interpretations." Non-Malays that the reasonable demands of equal rights, but was a handful of Malay populists speculation is deliberately destroying the Malay privileges to enter the number, then Lee is advocating the "Malaysian Malaysia" promise. This evolution began the development of materials is certainly not the Prime Minister Najib clinics. Can be when he advocated "a Malaysian," surviving when the concept of "creative ambiguity", just as the unique motives of those who deliberately distort the space provided.
In fact, this scenario has to be found before the case, then Prime Minister Mahathir promoting "Malaysian race" (BANGSA MALAYSIA) philosophy, the Malay society, the conservative populist Could it not also be the interpreted as "assimilation," a synonym for ? paradox is that today could even have been retired for many years stood in opposition to Mahathir for UMNO's populist and indigenous authority of the organization (PERKASA) support the idea of advocating arrogance.
Respective interpretations from the current phenomenon of view, way of thinking of all ethnic groups and ideologies of the gap is quite obvious. Non-Malays want equal rights of national equality, measured in terms of universal values, nature is nothing wrong, there is a rational appeal rights section. But from the standpoint of the interests of ethnic Malays, this is nothing more than an inherent prerogative of the impact of constitutional violations in disguise.
Thus, even moderate Malay society, the interests of his family demands recognition of its bottom line at best "fair treatment" and not on an equal footing. Children in this critical juncture, the Malays are more brazenly populist, straight to non-Malays as outsiders. Near to, created a hubbub of "alien" theory, "the passengers on the" and "back to China on the" other paper, it is testimony to such thinking. For them, a group of outsiders is sit back and enjoy, I have the same rights of procedure, is exceptionally accommodating.
In the long term "zero-sum sense" (ieZERO SUM Mentality, commonly known as "you win I lose" attitude of consciousness) and Malaysia to dictate doctrine (MALAY DOMINANCE) indoctrination, the identity of all ethnic groups equal rights, denied the privileges of the family of the so-called Malay liberals, after all, still a minority, is a non-Malay community in the mainstream.
In Chinese society, to the general public attitude, the respect for the Constitution, Malays are given special status and rights is indisputable fait accompli. However, it does not mean he family of the erosion of civil rights and should therefore be excluded. Prime Minister Najib Chinese community, "a Malaysian" idea kept hold hope, not only because it gives the Chinese community that a fair policy, the implementation of equal rights, opportunities; more importantly, its integration of all ethnic groups will be able to further develop the inherent complementary strengths, thereby strengthening the country's competitiveness.
Chinese community that the reform of the Prime Minister Najib sincerity, but only to reform and change must be unwavering. Any gains and losses based on narrow political considerations for the compromise, frustration is bound to make reforms, or even have lost. Patent reform and change is not an opposition party, nor is it synonymous with regime change.
A long-ruling political parties, in both cases, reform: First, the initiative for sustainable governance reforms in order to give new hope to the people and the times, catch up with the beat of world development; the second is to keep the regime change to be passive. This reform mainly due to the current situation needs. Say it is good advice, overlooking the public opinion; be embarrassed in front of us the reality is, if not reform, much to overthrow the only choice.
Ju Fan is a long-ruling political parties, interest groups seem to have elbow Zheng Butuo the curse of the system. But why would any form of direct or indirect loss of reform and vested interest groups, so reform will encounter these forces strike back, things are expected. In the current party political system, party control of the party preferences and decision making. Once the penetration of the interests of the party intended to be any response to the reform of public ambition, and ultimately all will be lost and go.
Of course, since the control of politicians willing to accept the interests of the party boss, party preferences do not see a deviation from public opinion will be aroused public anger, even to the party will face the possibility of disaster. But their plan is: not only is drowned soon, and I bow before the provisional resignation, it is a harsh fishing, but also get on after all.
This is the long-term corrosion of the portrayal of money politics, not difficult, after the tsunami from the 308 political inspiration in the political environment. Judging from this, the Prime Minister Najib could almost mistake? "One Malaysia" concept can do so implemented, it will not only test the Prime Minister's commitment to reform and perseverance, while the BN and UMNO party preferences in public opinion between the pros and cons of just the right choice, is it not a severe test?
However, today it is in different populations, the effects caused by, but it has serious divisive and become "a Malaysian, respective interpretations." Non-Malays that the reasonable demands of equal rights, but was a handful of Malay populists speculation is deliberately destroying the Malay privileges to enter the number, then Lee is advocating the "Malaysian Malaysia" promise. This evolution began the development of materials is certainly not the Prime Minister Najib clinics. Can be when he advocated "a Malaysian," surviving when the concept of "creative ambiguity", just as the unique motives of those who deliberately distort the space provided.
In fact, this scenario has to be found before the case, then Prime Minister Mahathir promoting "Malaysian race" (BANGSA MALAYSIA) philosophy, the Malay society, the conservative populist Could it not also be the interpreted as "assimilation," a synonym for ? paradox is that today could even have been retired for many years stood in opposition to Mahathir for UMNO's populist and indigenous authority of the organization (PERKASA) support the idea of advocating arrogance.
Respective interpretations from the current phenomenon of view, way of thinking of all ethnic groups and ideologies of the gap is quite obvious. Non-Malays want equal rights of national equality, measured in terms of universal values, nature is nothing wrong, there is a rational appeal rights section. But from the standpoint of the interests of ethnic Malays, this is nothing more than an inherent prerogative of the impact of constitutional violations in disguise.
Thus, even moderate Malay society, the interests of his family demands recognition of its bottom line at best "fair treatment" and not on an equal footing. Children in this critical juncture, the Malays are more brazenly populist, straight to non-Malays as outsiders. Near to, created a hubbub of "alien" theory, "the passengers on the" and "back to China on the" other paper, it is testimony to such thinking. For them, a group of outsiders is sit back and enjoy, I have the same rights of procedure, is exceptionally accommodating.
In the long term "zero-sum sense" (ieZERO SUM Mentality, commonly known as "you win I lose" attitude of consciousness) and Malaysia to dictate doctrine (MALAY DOMINANCE) indoctrination, the identity of all ethnic groups equal rights, denied the privileges of the family of the so-called Malay liberals, after all, still a minority, is a non-Malay community in the mainstream.
In Chinese society, to the general public attitude, the respect for the Constitution, Malays are given special status and rights is indisputable fait accompli. However, it does not mean he family of the erosion of civil rights and should therefore be excluded. Prime Minister Najib Chinese community, "a Malaysian" idea kept hold hope, not only because it gives the Chinese community that a fair policy, the implementation of equal rights, opportunities; more importantly, its integration of all ethnic groups will be able to further develop the inherent complementary strengths, thereby strengthening the country's competitiveness.
Chinese community that the reform of the Prime Minister Najib sincerity, but only to reform and change must be unwavering. Any gains and losses based on narrow political considerations for the compromise, frustration is bound to make reforms, or even have lost. Patent reform and change is not an opposition party, nor is it synonymous with regime change.
A long-ruling political parties, in both cases, reform: First, the initiative for sustainable governance reforms in order to give new hope to the people and the times, catch up with the beat of world development; the second is to keep the regime change to be passive. This reform mainly due to the current situation needs. Say it is good advice, overlooking the public opinion; be embarrassed in front of us the reality is, if not reform, much to overthrow the only choice.
Ju Fan is a long-ruling political parties, interest groups seem to have elbow Zheng Butuo the curse of the system. But why would any form of direct or indirect loss of reform and vested interest groups, so reform will encounter these forces strike back, things are expected. In the current party political system, party control of the party preferences and decision making. Once the penetration of the interests of the party intended to be any response to the reform of public ambition, and ultimately all will be lost and go.
Of course, since the control of politicians willing to accept the interests of the party boss, party preferences do not see a deviation from public opinion will be aroused public anger, even to the party will face the possibility of disaster. But their plan is: not only is drowned soon, and I bow before the provisional resignation, it is a harsh fishing, but also get on after all.
This is the long-term corrosion of the portrayal of money politics, not difficult, after the tsunami from the 308 political inspiration in the political environment. Judging from this, the Prime Minister Najib could almost mistake? "One Malaysia" concept can do so implemented, it will not only test the Prime Minister's commitment to reform and perseverance, while the BN and UMNO party preferences in public opinion between the pros and cons of just the right choice, is it not a severe test?
Original Posting : http://ongteekeat.net/
No comments:
Post a Comment