01 September 2010

Behind the Chinese school controversy : Ong Tee Keat

By Ong Tee Keat

The dire need for a new Chinese primary school in any community is sure to attract support and will hog the limelight as far as the Chinese community is concerned. Politicians from both sides of the political divide will clamour for a piece of the action in the hope of winning the hearts and minds of the ethnic Chinese voters. In their minds, this is a short-cut that will catapult them into political stardom.

The scenario in my constituency, Pandan, is no different. Several months ago, my service centre received complaints from the public of a alleged misuse of public donations collected in 2007 purportedly for the building of a new Chinese primary school on a plot of land which was known to be a “green-lung” of Pandan Perdana. We were shocked to learn of this. However, no action could be taken as there was insufficient evidence to prove any misdeed or misappropriation.

Recently, the issue came to light again when a few individuals, including local residents who used to champion the said cause alongside the then potential DAP candidate for Teratai state constituency, Jenice Lee Ying Ha (present state assemblywoman for Teratai) came forth with more startling expose. They brought along hand-held fans bearing her portrait which they bought in the name of supporting the said school project. They parted with their hard earned money by buying the fans primarily to support a noble cause — the school project — not so much to support any individual personality nor was it to cool them from the hot weather.

That was when their dreams were dashed and nightmare began. Many politicians merely pay lip service to their claims of transparency and accountability. To date, no account of the donations was published, and the generous donors were kept in the dark of where their money had gone to. What is obvious is that there is no sign of any Chinese school in the area concerned.

The complaint was lodged at my service centre, and I was alerted to this incident by my constituency service assistant Cindy Leong. I promptly advised the complainants to lodge an official report to both the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) and the police. (Cindy Leong was merely escorting them to do the needful. She was not one of the complainants as was erroneously reported in certain media).
This has touched a raw nerve from the other side of the political divide and Jenice herself has come into the open to attempt to explain her stand, which has raised more questions than answers.

1) In the first place, why were the purported funds raised for a new Chinese primary school in Pandan Perdana championed by Jenice declared as DAP Party Funds? I, for one, am not against anyone raising funds for their own political interests and needs. However, collecting money from the public by claiming that they are being raised for a non-existent school reeks of abuse and is in bad taste. The education ministry record shows that such a project had never been approved.

2) Even if the funds raised were meant for her party, the donors and general public have a legitimate expectation to know the accounts such as the amount of monies raised and how far has it being used for the desired purpose of school project. This is not forthcoming.

3) The explanation that the status of the said plot of “green lung” had yet to be converted for use as school reserve is no more than a flimsy excuse. Jenice was successfully elected as the state assemblywoman in Teratai and has since been serving as a ruling party legislator in Selangor (presently under Pakatan Rakyat’s rule). Has she ever initiated any attempt to do the land conversion in her capacity of state assemblyperson in Teratai under the Pakatan held state of Selangor ever since she assumed office? Much to the chagrin of the complainants, the status of the said plot of land has hitherto remained unchanged. No applications for conversion had ever been made, making a mockery of the school fund raising project.


I am not interested in politicising the issue. However, as a responsible elected representative, I am under an obligation to get answers for the people who came to me for help. As bona fide donors and supporters, they had a legitimate expectation to know the truth. The way to resolve this is for my fellow elected state representative, Jenice Lee, to come forward by providing a clear and logical explanation about what happened to the monies raised and where they went. I am merely echoing what the people want and expect.

However, instead of providing valid and logical reasons, Jenice did exactly the opposite by further clouding the issue by resorting to name calling and smear tactics. She labelled me a “butcher” (when she called me to lay down the butcher’s chopper in Chinese) for no apparent reason. Furthermore, Cindy Leong’s good name was also dragged into the mud when she was accused of committing “political immorality” whereas she was merely facilitating the complainants’ legal and moral right to lodge a police report.

She also attempted to confuse and hoodwink the people by shifting the blame squarely on me and the federal government, knowing that powers of land conversion come under the jurisdiction of the State authorities of which she is now attached to.
She can easily bring this issue up to the state government in her capacity as state assemblyperson but she has not done so in the past three years.

Jenice is free to say anything she wants but I am confident that the people are not as blind as her. I have always maintained the importance of walking the talk and have tried to fulfil what I’ve promised the people, especially on an important issue such as building of schools.

I am not part of her “buying a fan in support of a school” ploy and prefer to focus on my own initiative in securing the approval for relocating an under-enrolled Chinese primary school, SJKC Choon Hwa ( Batu 18, Hulu Langat) to Pandan. The initiative first began in 2006 and approval was granted in 2008.

In addition to this, a government allocation of RM3 million was successfully secured in 2009 for the School Building Committee and the Board of School Directors to build the school premises during my tenure as president of MCA. The committee comprising the community activists and educationists had in the past few years never burdened the public by calling for any form of fund raising. As an MP myself, I strongly maintained that government fund has to be solicited for the building of a government-run Chinese primary school.

As for Jenice, a former DAP supporter has candidly opined that she does not need to be fearful of any public scrutiny so long as she upholds the principle of transparency and accountability in dealing with public funds. Indeed this should be our common concern irrespective of party affiliation. Any ill-conceived contemplation to demonise the rightful complainants would render no service to protecting one’s credibility though it may help gloss over the issue for the time being. We’re still waiting for answers.www.ongteekeat.net
 
 

Tips for women to prevent sex crimes

Sun, Aug 29, 2010 New Straits Times

KUALA LUMPUR - Being old, unattractive or having your period does not deter a rapist.

In fact, he could have a fetish for elderly women, said founder of the Malaysian Volunteer Fire and Rescue Association (MVFRA) Captain K. Balasupramaniam.

In other words, any woman can be a potential rape victim.

This was greeted by gasps from his female audience at a three-hour "City Survival Skills" programme held at the Ampang Jaya Municipal Council (MPAJ) auditorium yesterday.

The programme, jointly organised by the Women, Family and Community Development Ministry, Yayasan Bakti Nusa Malaysia and Persatuan Belia Rakan Nusa, was also attended by Pandan member of parliament Datuk Seri Ong Tee Keat.

It was an eye-opener for the women who listened with rapt attention to Balasupramaniam's case studies on violent and sexual crimes against women and useful tips and tricks on how women can safeguard themselves against potential threats and danger.

"Most of the time, dangerous situations can be avoided if we understand the three types of danger zones.

"For example, if you're in the office during working hours then that means you're in the green zone.

"The yellow zone is when it's already 5pm and a few colleagues have left. This is when you know there is a potential threat within your parameter.

"But when everyone has left the office, then you must already be in self-defence mode because this is when you're in the red zone."

Balasupramaniam said women must never let down their guard even when a security guard is in the office.

"Anyone can rape you as long as there is opportunity and time," he said, citing a list of case studies on women who were raped and murdered by men from various backgrounds.

He shared with the audience how women could create opportunities for themselves to escape from their attackers with some self-defence tips.

"If they grab you from behind, use your head and swing back into their faces to break their noses or kick them in the shin," he said.

Balasupramaniam also shared with the audience how women could make their homes burglar-proof and prevent snatch thefts by using handbags that have clasps on the straps.

"When the snatch thief grabs your handbag, the clasps will give way and they will be left with only the straps.

"Don't get handbags with stitched straps as they won't snap and you may end up being dragged along with the bag," he said, adding that women should carry a water-based pepper spray.

The search for the truth starts. PKFZ

Citizen Nades - By R. Nadeswaran ( Every Monday & Wednesday ) The SUN

IN mid-2003, the first signs of impending problems at the Port Klang Free Zone (PKFZ) were published in this newspaper. It was a passing comment in the No Punches Pulled column which appeared in the now-discontinued Sun Weekender.  I had briefly touched on the price of the land which was bought from the local co-operative at RM3 per sq ft and sold to the Lembaga Pelabuhan Klang (LPK) or the Port Klang Authority (PKA) at RM25 per sq ft.

No one responded to my subsequent scathing columns which demanded answers. The silence from the Transport Ministry and the PKA was deafening. Despite regular reminders, nothing was forthcoming except an anonymous letter which landed on our desk a few months later. It started:

LPK was always financially strong. In fact, it was the best managed statutory board in the country in the 1980s and 1990s. During the final phase of privatisation in 1995 it had RM450 million in reserves in a government approved bank. It was debt free in spite of building the first phase of West Port. Interestingly. LPK also paid RM50 million as taxes to the government. Today, we understand that LPK as a regulator with less than 100 staff will not be able to finance its budget from internal resources. What happened to all the funds? Who is responsible for the total financial mismanagement? All fingers point to three possible parties as custodians of the Port Authority’s funds…

This precipitated what was to become a series of exposes on the biggest financial scandal in this country, dwarfing the Bumiputra Malaysia Finance (BMF) scandal which rocked the country in the 80s. A series of explosive articles and columns continued exposing the weaknesses, abuse and misuse of power. We were careful not to point fingers at anyone as we are merely journalists pointing out the faults. We could not and will never be the judge, jury and executioner. We left it to the authorities to act, but it was not until a new minister who took over the transport portfolio when the wheels of justice began turning. Datuk Seri Ong Tee Keat called in independent auditors and the rest, as they say, is history.

Today is not the culmination of the scandal that has dogged three former transport ministers, three past chairmen of the PKA and dozens of civil servants and individuals who served on the board. The trial of former PKA general manager Datin Paduka Phang Oik Choo will give a glimpse on how the PKA ended up insolvent and had to go with a begging bowl to seek a bailout. Let’s not prejudge the issue. The concept of innocent until proven guilty must prevail.

Phang is accused of three counts of criminal breach of trust (CBT) involving RM254.85 million from three RHB accounts between Oct 1, 2004 and May 9, 2006 and if convicted, faces a maximum 20 years’ jail and a fine on each charge.

The trial of Malaysia’s biggest financial fiasco where the development costs of the 1,000-acre integrated cargo distribution hub and industrial park escalated from RM2 billion to RM4.6 billion will be watched closely. Others charged in the PKFZ scandal are former Kuala Dimensi Sdn Bhd (KDSB) project director Law Jenn Dong, 51, KDSB CEO Stephen Abok, 51, and architect Bernard Tan Seng Swee, 48, from BTA Architect. KDSB is the turnkey developer for the PKFZ project while BTA Architect was the project’s consultant.

Going back to the ominous warnings of the financial disaster which stood before us and the failure to act by the authorities will be an exercise in futility. Delving into the past is of little use. Lest we are accused of contempt of court, we will refrain from commenting on the case proper or making judgments.

The prosecution will have to make out its case with documentary evidence and through witnesses. And for the next few days or so, the testimony of the witnesses and the conduct of counsel for both the prosecution and defence will come under public scrutiny. This case cannot and should not be decided by a court of public opinion, but a competent court of law. We may have our views, opinions and knowledge, but what will ultimately clinch the case are facts and nothing else.

The prosecution of key players marks a watershed in the history of our country. Although a few low-level officers have been charged and convicted with mismanagement and misuse of funds in the past, this is the first time a senior official has been charged with sums exceeding RM250 million. As they say, let the trial start and we, the lesser mortals, will watch with our eyes wide open.

R. Nadeswaran, who broke the PKFZ scandal may not be able to sit through the entire court proceedings, but will surely make applications for trial notes at a later stage. Comments: citizen-nades@thesundaily.com

人生之旅 - 国庆日感言 (My feeling towards 53th Malaysia Independence Day) by WoeiDar Chai

by WoeiDar Chai on Monday, August 30, 2010

有国才有家? 有家才有国? 我爱马来西亚吗?国家爱我们吗?

今天,我想借用马来西亚第五十三届国庆日的名誉下写出一编文章及感想。

今天,我相信很多人都会觉得我们国家有太多不公平的政策了。从新经济固打制,到JPA SCHOLARSHIP, 然后到华裔的公民权等等!

其实,马来西亚真的那么差吗?还是这些都是人为,因为人为导致种种偏私出现,所以我们渐渐地产生了一种慢性的心理怨恨。说真的,我也是一个很不满这种国家政策的一份子,因为我总觉得政府在偏帮一个种族,我总觉得华裔是第二等公民。但,随着我的年龄增长,我倒觉得我们是全世界最幸福的华裔。试想想,在这个世界上,除了大部分以华裔为主的国家如中国,台湾,香港,新加坡,谁的国家的华裔可以享有华文名字;那就是大马。 如果说新经济固打制不公平,为什么大马十大首富都是华人为主 (Robert Kuok,Teh Hong Piow,Lee Shin Cheng,Quek Leng Chan,Yeoh Tiong Lay,Tiong Hiew King,Vincent Tan,Lee Kim Hua)。我们大马华裔是全世界生存力最高的华裔,因为我国的政治结构,缔造了我们这一班华裔精英。

说真的,我倒觉得自己的身份很特别,我是马来西亚华裔,我从来不觉得我是第二等公民。我觉得只要我是有受过正统教育的人,我早已就明白了我的身份,我的身世,我的确是大马第一等公民(宪法第十四-第二十二)。

在以前,在2000年前,我们更本是没有机会就读 MATRIKULASI, 我们根本是没有机会拿到 JPA SCHOLARSHIP 的。因为土著及马来人认为这是宪法赋予他们的特权(宪法第153章),但为什么我们可以争取到,是马华还是行动党的功劳?其实,是谁争取到的并不重要,最重要的是我们华裔子弟们受益,从没有到有,从10%的开放制度到全部申请者都得益。因为首相拿督斯里納吉宣布不分种族,发出公共服务局海外奖学金予以考获 9科A+的SPM优秀生的课题指出,所有的优秀生都应该有机会继续的留在国内接受高深教育,政府在这方面应以实际的行动落实。

我觉得自己以前很天真,我总觉得政府是一个大魔鬼,因为他们常偏帮马来人及土著。但,我今天并不觉得是政府的错,因为我国并没有一条法令及宪法要求马来同胞大义灭华,我们并没有法令要求我们回到中国去!对,我国的确是出现一些很荒缪的理论,如寄蟹论,校长要求学生回到中国去。但,这些并不是政府的问题,这些是属于一些“神经有问题的人物”,因为他们并不是代表全部的马来同胞及土著。

还记得,爸爸妈妈常说:“阿弟,他们那些人不用读书的,他们是被养的”。以前,我还以为爸妈的话很对,但随着我的长大,我看到了马来同胞及土著的成功。很多时候,我国最有权威的专家如心脏专家,博士,工程师,律师,他们都是马来同胞及土著。到底华裔的成就在那儿,原来我们全部都走到经商这一门职业,这我们可以从大马富豪榜看看,华裔占大部分。其实,还有很多马来人及土著都是很有学识的。他们其实都不许政府拐杖的帮助,他们都支持废除一些特权,因为他们都知道如果民族要强大,一定要多多磨练,自力更生。但,你觉得会有几位马来人及土著族愿意放下。如果强硬废除,马来西亚会大乱吗?后果会怎样?难道换了政府就能改变吗?

今天,我想如果大家是有受过正统教育的话,我们更不应该质疑自己的公民权,我们更不应该担忧政府的偏私,我们也不需要为我们的教育奖学金担忧,因为我们都有资格享受这一些特权。

有国才有家,我也相信这一句话。我是华人,我也知道华人的心态,因为我们华人总是要求更多,我们总是不会满足于现在。但,我希望我们华人在进步的时候,我们可以望望后面的一些弱势群族,因为我们还有很多华裔,巫裔,印裔,土著活在低水平的生活。

一个马来西亚,ONE MALAYSIA, SATU MALAYSIA. 您相信吗?对我而言,我选择了相信,因为我看到了政府的改革,我看到政府尤其是首相纳吉更关注华裔的问题,从JPA SCHOLARSHIP,反对PERKASA,独中能贷款及打压种族言论主义,政府更关注我们华裔的心声。我也希望,我们也能表示领情,投我以桃,报之以李。纳吉这样做,他已经引起马来社会很大的不满,因为马来社会已经封他为PERDANA MENTERI (CINA)。这就是一个事实,如果我们选择相信他是一个明君,他更可以带动华社,为何我们不给于他一个小小的鼓励。我也相信,如果他得到我们华社的鼓励及认同,首相将会为我们争取更多,因为他是 ONE MALAYSIA 的创始人。我不是替他说好话,我只是分享首相的新国家领导政策,起码,我感觉得到了他对于我们的关怀及关心,就让时间来证明吧!

最后,我希望大家可以以开明的想法去分别是非,谁错谁对?我更想大家好好运用自己的智慧去分析每一样在大马所发生的事件。到底我们华裔是否生活地幸福吗?还是我们是一种不能自足的民族?难道新加坡的华裔过得很好吗?难道中国的华裔是过得最幸福的吗?大马的华裔们,您们幸福吗?

今天,我们是否还能像国父TUNKU ABDUL RAHMAN, 陈祯禄,Tun Sambanthan 手牵手,共享繁荣吗?如果我们想要繁荣及公平的发展,我们更应该继续留在马来西亚为我们的下一代付出!

A special writting I would like to share in conjunction with 53th Malaysia Independence Day. Malaysia, my country, I will always protect my motherland because I born here and I grew here. If one day Malaysia is gone, I will lose my nationality. If I have my ability to protect my motherland, I will fight till my last blood to secure the motherland.

Today, it is our time to construct for a betterment of Malaysia.
The day Abu, Ah Chong & Muthu say Merdeka, Merdeka, Merdeka together.
So, can we say it again my friends regardless of the colour of skin?

The symbolic of the independence of Malaysia, the official flag of Malaysia and Negaraku
 Our achievement...
It is not enough, we should move together, we should build together. 
But We should not leave the motherland - Malaysia

Clear Punitive Measures Needed To Tackle Racism, Says Tee Keat

 August 30, 2010 20:34 PM

GEORGE TOWN, Aug 30 (Bernama) -- There must be some clear punitive measures to tackle racism, said former MCA president Datuk Seri Ong Tee Keat.

Ong, who is Member of Parliament (MP) for Pandan, said the act of insulting other races should not be viewed lightly and that action must be taken against the culprits.

"We must stop such actions which may jeopardise the current multi-racial harmony in the country by coming out with clear punitive measures," he told reporters after holding a dialogue session Penang MCA Youth representatives here Monday.

Ong said this in commenting on the case of a school principal in Kulai Jaya Johor who is alleged to have made racist remarks during an assembly in conjunction with the Merdaka month.

Ong added that in conjunction with the Merdeka month, all Malaysians should work together to improve the country's economy instead of resorting to insulting other races.

-- BERNAMA